This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Powered by Squarespace
    Subscribe

    This site was originally about the real estate industry, but now it is about libertarian ideas, politics, economics, government, freedom, entrepreneurship, innovation, objectivty and other such stuff important to humans. I uphold libertarian principles and believe wholeheartedly in limited government -- this blog explains why.

    Bookmark and Share
    Blog Ratings
    Blogged Blogged Blogged Blogged Blogged Blogged Blogged
    Bloggers' Rights at EFF
    Libertarian reading suggestions
    « An interesting story for bloggers | Main | Interview With Blogging Guru, Mike Farmer »
    Saturday
    21Jun

    Does Google need frills?

    Lani wrote a good post about Google and Search Me the other day, but I'm wondering if Google needs to change their site. For search results I still like good results delivered straight. The moving web pages of Search Me are annoying-- I find them distracting.

    Google's success has been their straight forward, no frills, delivery of good results.

    I understand visual enhancements for sites -- I want my own site to be more visually pleasing (however, it delivers just fine the way it is), but sometimes that can be misleading and distracting. It might be me, but when I'm searching for information I want it delivered straight-up with no distractions.

    I have started using Google in many ways -- note keeping, information management, documents, calendars, news source - and what I like is the plainness an simplicity of it. There are no distractions.


    Reader Comments

    There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>