Although Wasserman-Schultz only implied Tea Party culpability, she might as well have stated it explicitly, because that was her intent. DWS reflects the intellectual decay on the Left that I wrote about yesterday. Democrats could have chosen one of their more intellectually astute members to represent them, but they chose DWS, a brain-dead partsian who is not bright enough to see that her implication of the Tea Party is more vicious and hateful than what she condemns. The madman who shot Giffords was not political, and no one has made any connection between the shooting and political speech, plus, the Tea Party is like a Sunday School group next to OWS. Liberal Democrats will lose all credibility if they don't wake up and start using reason rather than rely on partisan emotions and mean-spirited smear tactics. I also heard several liberals on talk shows today continue to take Romney's statement about firing insurance companies out of context -- if this is the Democrat strategy for winning re-election, it's a sad one.