We need better pundits on the internet

http://ordinary-gentlemen.com/eliasisquith/2012/06/romney-to-rubio/

The least they can do is when facts come out to refute their baseless claims, or claims based on rumor, is admit that they don't know what they are talking about. Romney made a special point to shoot down this story - it's untrue. Rubio is being vetted. The site I've linked to was a stickler for facts a while back, but, now that they have many Leftist pundits, facts don't seem to matter. Not all pundits on the Left are dishonest, but when it comes to getting Obama re-elected, most on the Left are very dishonest and hypocritical. Look at what Andrea Mitchell did today. They're desperate.

Update on Tuesday, June 19, 2012 at 08:52PM by M. Farmer

Another example of piss-poor punditry. I don't know what Allahpundit is implying, but he gives way too much credence to the ABC dolt. The ABC dolt did sloppy reporting and now Allahpundit is following suit.

Romney will announce his pick when he's ready. Jeez, just back off and drink a beer or something. While Allahpundit is guessing, he could imagine that Romney vetted Rubio in a sauna without a questionaire -- or Romney could have vetted Rubio, then changed his mind, then spent a day in indecision, then decided to select him, then vetted Rubio's neighbor, then decided to forget about Rubio but couldn't, so he's vetting him again and has just given him a questionaire which Rubio hasn't looked at yet, but will get around to this evening over a glass of wine..