<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.8.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:59:20 GMT--><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/universal/styles/feed.css"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Libertarian Blog - Comments</title><link>http://bonzai.squarespace.com/blog/</link><description></description><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.8.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Mike Farmer comments on The Great Healthcare Scam of 2009</title><author>Mike Farmer</author><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:24:02 +0000</pubDate><link>http://bonzai.squarespace.com/blog/2009/11/20/the-great-healthcare-scam-of-2009.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">196716:1909084:comment/6354498</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I agree Jeff, people should pay for their emergency room visits. As a society, if we choose to be charitable and build charity hospitals for the needy, then we should do so, and i beleive this would happen if government gets out of healthcare. Also, society needs be a pressure valve so that when young people come of age, it's practically a given that they get some sort of low cost catastrophic insurance coverage to cover emergencies -- but they shouldn't be forced to pay for full healthcare policies if they don't want to purchase the policy -- our society needs persuasion and peer pressure, not coercion.</p><p>With a lot of the safety net issue, creative insurance arrangements are the answer -- but the free market will meet these demands at an affordable cost if government does not interfere.</p><p>We've got to begin thinking outside the government box.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Jeff Johnson comments on The Great Healthcare Scam of 2009</title><author>Jeff Johnson</author><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:49:19 +0000</pubDate><link>http://bonzai.squarespace.com/blog/2009/11/20/the-great-healthcare-scam-of-2009.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">196716:1909084:comment/6353872</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>As a society, we need to decide whether everyone has healthcare paid for with mandatory insurance, or we allow people to go without insurance if they choose to do so.  I favor the latter, but I also favor turning their unpaid emergency room bill (or any hosptialization they get) over to the IRS for collection.</p><p>Just as it is an injustice to force a free person to purchase a product, it should also be not allowed to saddle the rest of society with the bill due to their lack of personal responsibility.</p><p>The whole abortion thing is what gets me.  Regardless if you are pro-choice or pro-life, show me one existing insurance plan where an abortion is not considered an elective procedure.  My insurance doesn't even cover a yearly physical or vaccines, and I work for a hospital!</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Mike Farmer comments on The Great Healthcare Scam of 2009</title><author>Mike Farmer</author><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:46:43 +0000</pubDate><link>http://bonzai.squarespace.com/blog/2009/11/20/the-great-healthcare-scam-of-2009.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">196716:1909084:comment/6353088</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>But even with car insurance, it doesn't have to be mandatory. There could be an understanding in society, that in case of accidents, you can sue for damages, or buy a policy that covers you in case someone ran into you and there are repair damages or hospital bills, then the insurance compnay could sue for damgaes if someone else was at fault. Judges would likely be hard on people with no insurance and take what they can get to offset damages. It would probably all work out that people voluntarily get insurance once they saw what judges took from others if they didn't have insurance. Plus banks could require insurance if they are going to give a loan, which they already do.</p><p>I believe most people would get insurance, or pay for the damages out of their pocket, plus be way more careful;..-- in other words, we could work it out without mandating insurance.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Mike Farmer comments on The Great Healthcare Scam of 2009</title><author>Mike Farmer</author><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:36:26 +0000</pubDate><link>http://bonzai.squarespace.com/blog/2009/11/20/the-great-healthcare-scam-of-2009.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">196716:1909084:comment/6353050</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>It doesn't mean that at all -- you don't have to drive, and if you do drive, it's reasonable to protect other drivers by enforcing insurance if you are going to drive. This falls within the government's role of protecting the rights of others. Forcing people to buy health insurance is a violation of individual rights. You have the right to do what you want as long as it doesn't violate the rights of others.</p><p>Only people ignorant of the prinicples involved will make that analogy.</p><p>Plus, the topic of paying for government services -- we can raise taxes to pay for government services through indirect taxes -- it's the direct taxes which are immoral.</p><p>Think things through before you start making wild claims.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Kelly Roy comments on The Great Healthcare Scam of 2009</title><author>Kelly Roy</author><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:54:41 +0000</pubDate><link>http://bonzai.squarespace.com/blog/2009/11/20/the-great-healthcare-scam-of-2009.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">196716:1909084:comment/6352814</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Under this argument- we should eliminate the mandate for car insurance, everybody on your own.  For that matter we should eliminate the need for a driver license, any and all licensing requirements, eliminate all taxes and everybody goes it on their own. Of course that would mean, don't drive on roads, bridges, walk on sidewalks, go to a park or take an airplane flight, can't send your kids to school unless you already pay for them to go to private.  Can't have it both ways folks.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>forex robot comments on Moving past government claims of deregulation</title><author>forex robot</author><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:50:33 +0000</pubDate><link>http://bonzai.squarespace.com/blog/2009/11/16/moving-past-government-claims-of-deregulation.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">196716:1909084:comment/6321819</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>great post as usual .. thanks  .. you just gave me a few more ideas to play with</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Clay Barham comments on Bruce Bartlett -- another moderate statist, building Lego versions of conservatives</title><author>Clay Barham</author><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:33:45 +0000</pubDate><link>http://bonzai.squarespace.com/blog/2009/11/15/bruce-bartlett-another-moderate-statist-building-lego-versio.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">196716:1909084:comment/6294222</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>AMERICANS GETTING ORGANIZED!</p><p>A majority of Americans agreed with President Obama in 2008, that the interests of the community are more important than are the interests of the individual.  As a result, a new union organizing movement has begun, creating the Community Voters Union (CVU).<br/>Using the popular Card Check Program, community organizers forming the CVU will bring voters into a union, simplifying their community life.  When 1% of people in a region sign the CVU card checks given them at shopping malls, places of employment as well as door-to-door, the CVU will officially form.  They will be responsible for voting the interests of the community.  Voters need never go to the polls again.  Union leaders voting the community’s interests block big-money right wing attempts to sway voters.  Dues from each voter will pay the costs of this welcomed voter service.  The Community Union Councils gather periodically to decide who will hold elected offices as well as new legislation and enforcement procedures. The voters in community will never again have to worry about making those choices. The President encourages voters to take advantage of the CVU so the voting process is more orderly and predictable.  Because of his enormous popularity, people are rushing to obtain voting cards to sign up.  CVU will usher into American Politics a glorious new day of certainty and peace in voting. Right-wing extremist critics claim the first card checks will have only names from the graveyards to establish CVU supremacy.  They claim CVU is patterned after the USSR soviets, regional community voting blocs that transmit community interests to one central presidium or parliament. They are partially correct, in that the American Congress will be changed to a parliament and the Constitution set aside as a historical document only.  However, only community interests are important, which assigns to the CVU the control over what was once called “private property” and bank accounts in each of the regions they control. This will assure Americans that the wealth will be spread around, as the President was so well credited in his campaign.  There will no longer be term limits assigned to the office of President, only that he receives a periodic vote of confidence from the CVU.  Succession falls to the choice of the President when the need arises.  This, most Americans agree, is how an orderly government works.  For thousands of years, orderly government rested with a sovereign, a chief of state, where family members were trained to take the reins when the need arose, so we can look to having one of Obama’s daughters rise to that leadership position.  (Is this really an absurdity? claysamerica.com)</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Mike Farmer comments on Bruce Bartlett -- another moderate statist, building Lego versions of conservatives</title><author>Mike Farmer</author><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:33:59 +0000</pubDate><link>http://bonzai.squarespace.com/blog/2009/11/15/bruce-bartlett-another-moderate-statist-building-lego-versio.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">196716:1909084:comment/6287467</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jay.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Jay Chambers comments on Bruce Bartlett -- another moderate statist, building Lego versions of conservatives</title><author>Jay Chambers</author><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:22:29 +0000</pubDate><link>http://bonzai.squarespace.com/blog/2009/11/15/bruce-bartlett-another-moderate-statist-building-lego-versio.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">196716:1909084:comment/6287238</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I love it. Brilliant analogy, Mike.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Mike Farmer comments on Government has created its own failure</title><author>Mike Farmer</author><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:46:54 +0000</pubDate><link>http://bonzai.squarespace.com/blog/2009/11/11/government-has-created-its-own-failure.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">196716:1909084:comment/6260274</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Okay, as long as you give me cover, I'll give it another try. Between Jamelle and Freddie there is much work to be done. So many statists, so little time.</p>]]></description></item></channel></rss>